A reviewing administrator has determined that the model displayed in a nude or erotic manner in this photograph is under the age of eighteen (18). Removed as a violation of policy.
This message was generated automatically.
-- deviantART Staff
Feel free to view my latest works, and also read the description about what I think of the Bill Henson scandal going on at the moment. These photos were my response to this and dA, in all its ignorant glory, removed them because the photographer (me) took photos of a nude girl under the age of 18 (me). WHAT THE FUCK. Shit, I really shouldn't be a child pornographer and take photos of myself and then beat off to them later in all my paedophiliac ideologies. Get a fucking grip.
Devious Comments
I do love that it was generated automatically.
And that someone had to report you to begin with.
But this is why we all love deviantart, and in an extension, the rest of the adorable little art world. It's amazing that you could upload the same image the day of your 18th and no one would bat an eyelid, or that (just as with Mr. Henson) if someone hadn't have jumped up and down, no one would have noticed. Buuuut, because they did you now get to call your self a martyr.
YAY
I plan to darken the slight hint of boobage and upload it again. I'd like to see what happens.
--
they build you up to watch you fall.
--
Kater...
[link]
which is of a very clearly underage Brooke Shields, and let them know that it's currently on display in a retrospective at one of the most prestigious modern art museums in the United States, and see what they say about that.
dA is a bunch of prudes.
Previous PageNext Page